Friday, December 16, 2005

Story: The Great Gemmy Inflatable Christamas Snow Globe Hunt...

If had any foresight whatsoever, I would have found out who made that crazy snow globe that I first saw as the San Jose ski show, and purchased a boatload of them. Sure, they're over a hundred bucks each, but these things are the mostly highly sought after items since Furbies invaded the Christmas season. But, unlike Furbies, these things are slick. They self inflate in seconds and complete the snow globe package with falling snow and lights. Demand for the Gemmy snow globes this year has been high, but the price point meant that most happy owners were businesses looking to spruce up their store windows.

Demand has also erased stock from every reseller store shelf mentioned on Gemmy's website. Even stores not mentioned there like Sears, blew through the Peanuts versions of the snow globes and refused to restock them being so late in the season. Suckers! So, where is one to turn to when all else fails? I personally devoted several hours of my Sunday to hunt for these things in person because I made the mistake of sending a mobile photo of one to me wife.

I hopped in to the Beemer, and loaded every drug store, target, wal-mart, k-mart, and sears in the San Francisco Bay Area in to the nav system. One by one I was shot down, and faced instead by inflatable sponge bobs, santas and other gemmy products. Following the unsuccessful venture, I decided instead to look for the snow globe on the web. buyinflatables.com seemed like the most reliable source but their product ordering page kept incorrectly indicating they were out of product because my web browser would crash before I could checkout and the session cookie had to expire to free up the inventory. I finally got one and checked out. I received a receipt and a shipping notification, only to be fully refunded a day later due to lack of product. All seemed lost until I resorted to froogle. I typed "gemmy inflatable snow globe" and sure enough, a link to bronners.com, and unlike Sears, they had lots of inventory on hand. Could froogle actually be the best kept secret for finding hot new items on the Internet?! Well, considering the price gouging happening on Ebay to the uninitiated, it could be. While new owners choose to mount their new snow globes on their roofs to diswade would-be thieves because they overpaid by about 300%, you can be, well, froogle.

Sunday, November 20, 2005

Opinion: Sony Stifles The Very Creativity The Company Touts Its Product Line Encourages

Sony Stifles The Very Creativity The Company Touts Its Product Line Encourages

You'd have thought a few years ago that after picking up any copy of Sony Style, that Sony as a company was on the cusp of something great. The magazine depicted the Sony line as a collection of lifestyle products and tools for creative outlet. The loyal following that Sony electronics products in particular enjoys certainly indicates there is some truth to the various accounts portrayed in the articles. I myself have been a vehement advocate of Sony products because they are always cutting edge, reliable, and tastefully styled. But, over the past few years, Sony corporate appears to be at odds with itself, resulting in growth limitation, a dip in consumer confidence, and the stifling of the very creativity high cost marketing campaigns were actively encouraging. As soon as Sony became a content provider, their consumer products went to hell in a hand basket. Instead of being a leading proponent of digital rights management, Sony became wholly consumed with protecting its pricey investment and continued to push its varying proprietary formats and technologies.

Interestingly, engineering does not seem to be the primary problem. Sony continues to push out products that are simply stunning. There has however been a noticeable drop in quality of consumer products that anyone like myself who owns a large number of Sony products will most certainly attest to. For me these quality problems include burned out or hung pixels, a jammed DVD carousel, and a downright aweful cell phone. Whether the quality problems were due to partnering, cost cutting, or just plain sloppiness is difficult to say. But, I suddenly find myself second guessing as to whether or not I should purchase an extended warranty for my new Sony electronics purchases--something I would have never considered around the time the last Sony Style magazine rolled off the presses
.
It wasn't until I was looking to replace my car stereo that I realized the position that Sony has wedged itself in to. At Fry's electronics, I found a floor model Sony MEX-1HD head unit. The price mark down was astonishing, but I couldn't tell whether it could actually play ordinary MP3s or not. This stereo was an engineering marvel however. It had a 10 Gig hardrive that you could rip CDs to, a memory stick slot, RCA-style line ins, and a firewire port. But with all of this hardware, it was impossible to tell if I could use a regular memory stick or if I had to use MagicGate and only download Songs purchased from Sony/BMG. It also wasn't clear if I could play MP3s that had been burned to a disk or only on the memory stick media. All of the documentation seemed to downplay the unit's astounding capabilities. The original price was in the stratosphere, but if consumers actually knew what it was capable of, my guess is that many would consider it worth every penny. So, I purchased the product in hopes that it would meet my expectations, and though I got price gouged on the replacement of the knobs, it has far surpassed my wildest expectations.

In my eyes, this downplaying of product capabilities and features marked the beginning of Sony's campaign of protectivism. In recent news, Sony's insertion of spyware was uncovered where software was being automatically installed that secretly (and invisibly) prevented a cd from being ripped more than once. This was a clear act of abuse, and the way that Sony has handeled it has been irresponsible at best. A simlarly infuriating move which spurred this post was the forceful firmware upgrade of the PSP in order to view content of new UMDs. For consumers such as myself that actively purchase new UMD contents, but who happen to have a first generation PSP with a 1.5 version of the firmware, this is simply a slap in the face to close a discovered loophole that would allow PSP owners to write their own software and run it on the PSP. This strong arm tactic, though not surprising, is actually encouraging the proliferation of illegally copied content. There is nothing inherent in the firmware upgrade itself required for the UMD content to be played, and there is no requirement specification on the UMD box stating that the content requires a specific firmware level to run.

Liability appears to be a primary motivator for why companies such as Sony are reticent to allow consumers to use their product in ways in which it's creators were not intending. But is this not itself the key ingredient to being creative in the first place? Video game companies have already suffered for letigous moves against them for the creative motives of their end users. Being both creative and innovative in such a letigious environment certainly seems stifling to me. For Sony, this protectivism now extends all the way to Sony Style stores themselves, where customers are followed by numberous conspicous security personnel creating a rather hostile shopping environment for a company trying to showcase a digital lifestyle. I hope that Sony will soon sort out it's multiple personality disorder, and in the end follow the Google mantra that people are inherently good.

Friday, September 02, 2005

Opinion: Military "Aid"...

Everyone has an opinion on how the federal government has managed the crisis left in the wake of Katrina, so I will take this opportunity to share mine. The only aide this administration understands is militaristic in nature. Military presence is used as a measure of prevention, to take an offensive, as a display of power, and to quell disorder. Reasonable alternatives seem to be all-to-often overlooked in the days of the new cold war replacement, with it's all encompassing label "The war on Terror".

Thursday, August 25, 2005

Tech: Adding a new Search Engine programatically....

So you have a new cool google search appliance. Now you want a way for your users to be able to search easily from their Mozilla/Firefox browsers. The solution is to add your intranet search appliance as a new engine that will be available from both the sidebar and the menu bar. Programatically, this can be done using JavaScript by creating the following page:


<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>New Search Engine</TITLE></HEAD>
<BODY>

<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
function addEngine(name,ext,cat)
{
if ((typeof window.sidebar == "object") && (typeof
window.sidebar.addSearchEngine == "function"))
{
window.sidebar.addSearchEngine(
"http://googleapp.domain.com/"+name+".src",
"http://googleapp.domain.com/"+name+"."+ext,
name,
cat );
}
}
//-->
</script>
<a href="javascript:addEngine('EngineName','gif','Category')">Add Engine</a> (Google Appliance)

</BODY>
</HTML>



The src file and image will then be copied to the browser searchplugins folder. For
a Google Appliance, the contents of the src file might look like:



<search
version = "1.0"
name="EngineName"
description="EngineName Search"
method="GET"
action="http://googleapp.domain.com/search"
searchform="http://googleapp.domain.com/"
queryEncoding="UTF-8"
queryCharset="UTF-8"
>

<input name="le" value="en">
<input name="ie" value="UTF-8">
<input name="oe" value="utf-8">
<input name="q" user>
<input name="btnG" value="Google+Search">
<input name="site" value="MySheet">
<input name="client" value="Netli">
<input name="proxystylesheet" value="MySheet">
<input name="output" value="xml_no_dtd">
<input name="num" value="20">
<input name="sourceid" value="Mozilla-search">

# Finds results
<interpret
browserResultType="result"
resultListStart="<!--a-->"
resultListEnd="<!--z-->"
resultItemStart="<!--m-->"
resultItemEnd="<!--n-->"
>

# Finds Previous link
<interpret
browserResultType="result"
resultListStart=""
resultListEnd="d>"
resultItemStart=""
resultItemEnd=">

# Finds Next link
<interpret
browserResultType="result"
resultListStart="</a><td"
resultListEnd="</div><center>"
resultItemStart="nowrap>"
resultItemEnd="</table>"
>

</search>

<BROWSER
update="http://googleapp.domain.com/EngineName.src"
updateIcon="http://googleapp/EngineName.gif"
updateCheckDays="1"
>


Friday, July 08, 2005

Opinion: Airport security screening still does not work.

Through no premeditated motive, I have experienced this fact in person. It makes me reailze why airport security relies so heavily on racial profiling as a means of capture and preventing hostile incidents involoving airplanes. Airport screeing post 9/11 is supposed to be state of the art with highly specialized security agents carefully scrutinizing each and every item carried on board. The fault with any breech of security is often blamed on screeners; either because they got sloppy as a result of extended hours, or the sheer number of bags that have to look at with equal levels of intensity. I'm not convinced that is the case. I think the failure has a significant amount to do with the fact that they are interpreting two dimensional views of a three dimmensional space. Therefore the placement of objects ant the number of layers between them has a significant impact on the xray itself. I am not an expert in the area nor do I know much about the screening process itself. My perspective is simply based on the realization of what objects I have in my bags when I arrive at my final destination and how convoluted the policy of acceptable objects really is.

First I will address issues of policy. I have lost my two favorite screwdrivers (call me a dork if you will) to San Jose airport screeners. There was nothing mischevious about my having them; either to be used as a weapon or to do something a bit less harmful such as disabling a smoke detector in the lavatory. I work on computers, cars, and any other gadgets that I take apart attempt to get back together in one piece. So, I had unknown contraband that was successfully captured by airport security. So why would a screwdriver be caught and not something else? I believe it's simply because it is easier to identify. It has a fixed shaft that is rarely sheathed and a pattern that is recognizable by almost anyone. This seems like fairly understandable policy, though I'm convinced that the airport makes a mint off of selling confiscated items. Perhaps they take a more civic-minded route and donate them however. But, what about the policy of hammers? Specifically those lacking a claw to remove nails. It is a blunt object that when stiking someone over the head can kill them or severely immobilize them. In past trips coming back on international flights however, I have brought six packs of bottles on board. Have the policy makers never witnessed a bar fight before--or a street fight depicted in West Side Story?

Going to Las Vegas I carried a huge glass jug of Rum on board. This had nothing to do with the screeners as I passed it through the xray machine w/o even a bag to conceal it's identity. So clearly, this policy is dictated by money rather than security. I'm sure that the hit to airport tax exempt stores would be immense as a result of a no glass container policy. But I'm shocked no less to see them serve alcoholic beverages on board in glass as well. Perhaps first class passengers are considered exempt from potentially being "bad" people. More recently however, traveling from San Francisco to Cleveland, I had my bag scrutinized by security and passed through again. It was then taken over to a separate area and sorted. I was asked if I had any kinds of sharp metal objects to which I replied "Not that I'm aware of." It turns out that I had left my motorcycle wheel lock in my bag.



This device goes through the drill holes on the brake roter and affixes itself so that a would-be-thief cannot simply roll the bike away. Amazingly, after describing the device to him, and my bag passing for a third time through the xray machine, they let me keep my lock. Interestingly enough, when the shackle is removed, the device looks extremely similar to a screw driver. But, I didn't consider the impact of the fact that they let me keep the lock until pondering it during flight time. The lock
could easily be used as a blunt object just as a hammer, or as a sharp instrument identical to a screw driver. The lock also had an attached wire cable that could have been just as easily used to strangle someone. I suddenly felt both disheartened by the fact that we are given a sense of false security after all of these measures have been put in place, but also at the realization that there is no statistical way to prevent all motivated team-oriented terrrorist activities and that the government and media have so seriously seeded fear and doubt that travelers don't even trust the person in the seats next to them. Others have completely stopped traveling by air, which seems somewhat ironic given the number of attacks on buses and trains elsewhere in the world.

The most amazing part of my San Francisco to Cleveland trip was upon unpacking my backpack at my destination, pulling out a folding spyder blade about 4" long



from the second pocket of my bag. My bag went through the xray three times under heavy scrutiny. This was not a fluke that the screener wasn't paying attention, it simply revealed both a flaw in the technology and a flaw of the systm. I thought of how I'd stripped down to my socks and held up my jeans for lack of a belt as I walked through the metal detector awkwardly balancing my boarding pass in the other hand to be checked again for the fourth time in a span of 2 minutes. I would have written the incident off save for the fact that a similar event happened on a prior trip. This time, I forgot to move my Swiss card from my carry-on to my check through baggage. If you don't know what a Swiss card is, I will explain briefly. A Swiss Card is a credit card sized plastic case that attempts to mimic some of the hugely convenient items on the more well known Swiss Army Knife.

It has a pen, a nail file, a toothpick, and a 3 inch knife blade all packed neatly in to the case so that it can be carried in a wallet. I was not carrying it in my wallet at the time, but instead, in the outermost pocket of my backpack closest to the xray; but just behind a calculator-like device called an enigma card I used to connect back to my office network when traveling. Because I usually cart around a fair amount of electronics when traveling, my bag almost always gets screened more than once and frequently searched. In this instance, my bag was screened multiple times and the search completely missed the Swiss card on both accounts because
of it's form factor and where it was packed. Similar to my experience with the foldable blade, I was shocked to find the object at my destination, and, though happy to still have it in my possession, very concerned about the real possibility that a highly motivated individual or individuals can beat the current screening system just as easily now than they could before 9/11 even with no shoes or belt on.

Friday, May 13, 2005

First Post

New Blog for the personal opinions and interests of Rob Baker, aka Robby Baker, aka Robert Baker.